16 Dec 2025, Tue

The Supreme Court of India resolved a protracted legal dispute over the ownership of the Hare Krishna temple in Bengaluru

In a landmark ruling on May 16, 2025, the Supreme Court of India resolved a protracted legal dispute over the ownership of the Hare Krishna temple in Bengaluru. The apex court declared that the temple and its associated properties rightfully belong to ISKCON Bangalore, an independently registered society under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act. This decision overturned a previous Karnataka High Court judgment that had favored ISKCON Mumbai.

The dispute between ISKCON Bangalore and ISKCON Mumbai spanned over two decades, originating from differing interpretations of the organizational structure and authority within the International Society for Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON). ISKCON Mumbai contended that ISKCON Bangalore functioned merely as its branch and, therefore, lacked independent ownership rights over the temple property.

Conversely, ISKCON Bangalore maintained that it operated autonomously, with its own administrative and spiritual directives, distinct from the Mumbai society. The Bengaluru society emphasized its independent registration and management of the temple complex, asserting rightful ownership over the property.

The legal battle commenced in 2001 when ISKCON Bangalore filed a suit seeking a declaration of its ownership over the Hare Krishna temple located at Hare Krishna Hills, Rajajinagar, Bengaluru. In 2009, the trial court ruled in favor of ISKCON Bangalore, recognizing its legal title and granting a permanent injunction against ISKCON Mumbai from interfering in its affairs.

However, in 2011, the Karnataka High Court reversed this decision, siding with ISKCON Mumbai and asserting that the Bengaluru society was a subordinate branch. This prompted ISKCON Bangalore to appeal to the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court bench, comprising Justices Abhay S. Oka and Augustine George Masih, meticulously reviewed the case and concluded that ISKCON Bangalore is an independent legal entity. The court restored the 2009 trial court judgment, affirming ISKCON Bangalore’s ownership and restraining ISKCON Mumbai from any interference.

This verdict not only settles the ownership dispute but also underscores the importance of legal autonomy and the recognition of independent religious societies within India. It highlights the judiciary’s role in resolving complex organizational conflicts, especially those involving religious institutions.

ISKCON Bangalore’s President, Madhu Pandit Dasa, hailed the decision as a historic victory that validates their long-standing position and spiritual interpretation based on the directives of ISKCON founder Srila Prabhupada.

The Supreme Court’s ruling is expected to have far-reaching implications for religious organizations operating under umbrella entities, emphasizing the significance of legal independence and self-governance.

This case serves as a precedent for similar disputes, reinforcing the principle that independently registered societies have the right to manage their affairs without external interference, provided they operate within the legal framework.

The resolution of this dispute brings clarity and stability to the administration of the Hare Krishna temple in Bengaluru, ensuring that its operations align with the vision and management of ISKCON Bangalore.

It also allows ISKCON Bangalore to continue its various spiritual, educational, and charitable activities without legal hindrances, contributing positively to the community.

The verdict is a testament to the resilience and determination of ISKCON Bangalore in upholding its autonomy and serves as an example for other organizations facing similar challenges.

In conclusion, the Supreme Court’s decision marks the end of a significant chapter in the history of ISKCON in India, reinforcing the values of legal independence and organizational self-determination.


Key Details of the ISKCON Temple Ownership Dispute

AspectDetails
Dispute DurationOver 24 years
Parties InvolvedISKCON Bangalore vs. ISKCON Mumbai
Core IssueOwnership and administrative control of the Hare Krishna temple in Bengaluru
Initial Ruling (2009)Trial court favored ISKCON Bangalore, recognizing its ownership and granting a permanent injunction against ISKCON Mumbai
High Court Ruling (2011)Karnataka High Court reversed the trial court’s decision, siding with ISKCON Mumbai and asserting ISKCON Bangalore as a subordinate branch
Supreme Court Verdict (2025)Overturned the High Court’s decision, affirming ISKCON Bangalore’s independent legal status and ownership of the temple property
Legal SignificanceReinforces the autonomy of independently registered religious societies and sets a precedent for similar organizational disputes

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *